It doesn't take being a Supreme Court Justice to know that the opening shots of the Revolution were because the British had decided to collect the powder stores that the militia had. It also doesn't take being a Supreme Court Justice to know that the founding fathers had a problem with that action by the then government which is why they crafted the 2nd amendment the way that they did.
One may argue that "confiscating the powder stores" is reasonable and practical but history tells otherwise that it was NOT reasonable or acceptable. Thus to argue that the 2nd amendment means something else, patently ignores history.
Welcome to the new LiveJournal
Some changes have been made to LiveJournal, and we hope you enjoy them! As we continue to improve the site on a daily basis to make your experience here better and faster, we would greatly appreciate your feedback about these changes. Please let us know what we can do for you!